🛡️ Validator · KleverManiac#2

no behavioural red flagsgeneral forensic profile →

Status

eligible

Commission

30%

Self · total stake

1.5M · 12M KLV

≈$4,800 total

Self-stake share

13%

bls

Delegator KYT

Share of delegated stake from directly-labeled (threat/illicit) addresses — staking as a laundering vector. This drives the verdict.

No directly-labeled risky delegators.

Tracing delegator provenance (≤2 hops)…

Control surface

Who controls the validator — owner + permission/multisig signers.

owner klv1uykc5v…w2xpz5

No multisig/permission signers — single-key control.

Stake concentration · top delegators

top-1 13% · top-10 56% · band high

Stake · 22
other delegators2,895,611.48069624%
self-stake1,500,00013%
klv10l7v…asfj6935,1408%
klv1mfwl…dexpl905,0008%
klv13uef…za2sq850,0007%
Others (17)4,914,237.62555841%

Reward routing · context, not a flag

Up to this share of the rewards address's KLV outflow reaches exchange/bridge exits within 1–2 hops (an exposure ceiling — a shared intermediary can over-attribute). Cashing rewards out to a normal exchange is expected operator behaviour, so this is context, not a red flag. Multi-hop laundered routing is a follow-up.

claimed lifetime 753.34K KLV≈$1,700 at claim time· $301.33 now

0%reaches exchange/bridge exits · 1–2 hops

520.19K KLV left the rewards address — 0% (0 KLV) reached labeled exits, the rest went to other (unlabeled) addresses. The % is a share of outflow, not of the claimed total.

No reward outflow reaching a labeled exchange/bridge (1–2 hop).

Other destinations · non-exchange recipients

klv160q34c…z2emlwunlabeled515.65K KLV≈$206.26
klv1446rfq…lzlan0unlabeled4,540 KLV≈$1.82

Reward routing · context, not a flag

Crawling the rewards address's outflow (1–2 hops)…