🛡️ Validator · NEGA

no behavioural red flagsgeneral forensic profile →

Status

eligible

Commission

60%

Self · total stake

1.5M · 10M KLV

≈$4,002 total

Self-stake share

15%

bls

Findings

info · High commission (60%) with a single dominant delegator (52%) — possible operator self-routing; an unrelated delegator would earn almost nothing.

Delegator KYT

Share of delegated stake from directly-labeled (threat/illicit) addresses — staking as a laundering vector. This drives the verdict.

No directly-labeled risky delegators.

Tracing delegator provenance (≤2 hops)…

Control surface

Who controls the validator — owner + permission/multisig signers.

owner klv1nv50kw…me0pu3

No multisig/permission signers — single-key control.

Stake concentration · top delegators

top-1 52% · top-10 100% · band severe

Stake · 7
klv13nun…86xuc5,220,802.35781752%
klv1myxj…5ww5e3,246,798.79980432%
self-stake1,500,00015%
klv1v6ud…0wttt33,3000%
klv1fvm0…3ktvx2,0000%
Others (2)2,0000%

Reward routing · context, not a flag

Up to this share of the rewards address's KLV outflow reaches exchange/bridge exits within 1–2 hops (an exposure ceiling — a shared intermediary can over-attribute). Cashing rewards out to a normal exchange is expected operator behaviour, so this is context, not a red flag. Multi-hop laundered routing is a follow-up.

claimed lifetime 1.23M KLV≈$2,508 at claim time· $491.79 now

0%reaches exchange/bridge exits · 1–2 hops

336.53K KLV left the rewards address — 0% (0 KLV) reached labeled exits, the rest went to other (unlabeled) addresses. The % is a share of outflow, not of the claimed total.

No reward outflow reaching a labeled exchange/bridge (1–2 hop).

Other destinations · non-exchange recipients

klv1myxjpf…s5ww5eunlabeled336.53K KLV≈$134.61

Reward routing · context, not a flag

Crawling the rewards address's outflow (1–2 hops)…