🛡️ Validator · EtherealGuardian_4

no behavioural red flagsgeneral forensic profile →

Status

inactive

Commission

30%

Self · total stake

0 · 3.38M KLV

≈$1,351 total

Self-stake share

bls

Delegator KYT

Share of delegated stake from directly-labeled (threat/illicit) addresses — staking as a laundering vector. This drives the verdict.

No directly-labeled risky delegators.

Tracing delegator provenance (≤2 hops)…

Control surface

Who controls the validator — owner + permission/multisig signers.

owner klv14pya2y…erjqp9

No multisig/permission signers — single-key control.

Stake concentration · top delegators

top-1 11% · top-10 67% · band high

Stake · 21
other delegators399,194.09355612%
klv1cn0w…5sns6374,423.0511%
klv1pqfz…d84u4322,73010%
klv13nun…86xuc301,458.9385149%
klv18cup…j0tqj250,0007%
Others (16)1,730,345.92174851%

Reward routing · context, not a flag

Up to this share of the rewards address's KLV outflow reaches exchange/bridge exits within 1–2 hops (an exposure ceiling — a shared intermediary can over-attribute). Cashing rewards out to a normal exchange is expected operator behaviour, so this is context, not a red flag. Multi-hop laundered routing is a follow-up.

claimed lifetime 454.81K KLV≈$930.80 at claim time· $181.92 now

0%reaches exchange/bridge exits · 1–2 hops

456.16K KLV left the rewards address — 0% (0 KLV) reached labeled exits, the rest went to other (unlabeled) addresses. The % is a share of outflow, not of the claimed total.

No reward outflow reaching a labeled exchange/bridge (1–2 hop).

Other destinations · non-exchange recipients

klv16unm40…v9kpxvunlabeled456.16K KLV≈$182.46

Reward routing · context, not a flag

Crawling the rewards address's outflow (1–2 hops)…