🛡️ Validator · Klever-Tip

no behavioural red flagsgeneral forensic profile →

Status

eligible

Commission

50%

Self · total stake

1.5M · 11.96M KLV

≈$4,784 total

Self-stake share

13%

bls

Delegator KYT

Share of delegated stake from directly-labeled (threat/illicit) addresses — staking as a laundering vector. This drives the verdict.

No directly-labeled risky delegators.

Tracing delegator provenance (≤2 hops)…

Control surface

Who controls the validator — owner + permission/multisig signers.

owner klv148zvzk…3y5r56

No multisig/permission signers — single-key control.

Stake concentration · top delegators

top-1 20% · top-10 67% · band high

Stake · 22
klv16unm…9kpxv2,379,50020%
other delegators2,022,699.71740617%
self-stake1,500,00013%
klv1kal6…d0acd784,3017%
klv128cg…c8np3700,0006%
Others (17)4,573,073.18978438%

Reward routing · context, not a flag

Up to this share of the rewards address's KLV outflow reaches exchange/bridge exits within 1–2 hops (an exposure ceiling — a shared intermediary can over-attribute). Cashing rewards out to a normal exchange is expected operator behaviour, so this is context, not a red flag. Multi-hop laundered routing is a follow-up.

claimed lifetime 455.76K KLV≈$676.98 at claim time· $182.30 now

0%reaches exchange/bridge exits · 1–2 hops

486.11K KLV left the rewards address — 0% (0 KLV) reached labeled exits, the rest went to other (unlabeled) addresses. The % is a share of outflow, not of the claimed total.

No reward outflow reaching a labeled exchange/bridge (1–2 hop).

Other destinations · non-exchange recipients

klv128cg2n…nc8np3unlabeled486.1K KLV≈$194.44
klv1pycejk…ztud2zunlabeled5 KLV≈$0.00200

Reward routing · context, not a flag

Crawling the rewards address's outflow (1–2 hops)…