🛡️ Validator · SCROOGE

no behavioural red flagsgeneral forensic profile →

Status

eligible

Commission

10%

Self · total stake

1.5M · 10M KLV

≈$4,000 total

Self-stake share

15%

bls

Delegator KYT

Share of delegated stake from directly-labeled (threat/illicit) addresses — staking as a laundering vector. This drives the verdict.

No directly-labeled risky delegators.

Tracing delegator provenance (≤2 hops)…

Control surface

Who controls the validator — owner + permission/multisig signers.

owner klv13nun0w…886xuc

No multisig/permission signers — single-key control.

Stake concentration · top delegators

top-1 55% · top-10 100% · band severe

Stake · 5
klv13ezp…t02gd5,534,38055%
klv1g0n5…cp7742,531,44025%
self-stake1,500,00015%
klv1dj9f…v7lz3308,5203%
klv1v6ud…0wttt125,7001%

Reward routing · context, not a flag

Up to this share of the rewards address's KLV outflow reaches exchange/bridge exits within 1–2 hops (an exposure ceiling — a shared intermediary can over-attribute). Cashing rewards out to a normal exchange is expected operator behaviour, so this is context, not a red flag. Multi-hop laundered routing is a follow-up.

claimed lifetime 2.47M KLV≈$5,915 at claim time· $986.32 now

0%reaches exchange/bridge exits · 1–2 hops

1.07M KLV left the rewards address — 0% (0 KLV) reached labeled exits, the rest went to other (unlabeled) addresses. The % is a share of outflow, not of the claimed total.

No reward outflow reaching a labeled exchange/bridge (1–2 hop).

Other destinations · non-exchange recipients

klv1myxjpf…s5ww5eunlabeled1.07M KLV≈$427.60
klv1v6udrs…k0wtttunlabeled50 KLV≈$0.0200
klv1dj9f0u…6v7lz3unlabeled50 KLV≈$0.0200

Reward routing · context, not a flag

Crawling the rewards address's outflow (1–2 hops)…